 | | Re: Use of lugnet.castle.org
|
|
(...) I agree that there's certainly room for more .castle.orgs. My suggestion is that the point at which someone wants to start such a suggestion, they just ask for lugnet.castle.org to open for posting again. The other option perhaps is to just (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of lugnet.castle.org
|
|
(...) Once it went non postable, where would discussion of a competing (to CW) group and its early formative stage posts themselves go (prior to it getting its own castle.org.subgroup), should such arise? Mostly rhetorical, CW presumably has first (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
I would say I am having this problem also. I don't know the content of the ads as I tend to just delete them on sight. Maybe I am wrong about where the leak in my information is coming from, but what caught my eye is my FULL name in some of the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Use of lugnet.castle.org
|
|
I'm wondering if lugnet.castle.org should be made into a non-postable group. It seems to sport occasional Castle World postings which really don't belong since lugnet.castle.org.cw exists, and not much else. Frank "compartmentalized dork" Filz (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Newish Idea for LUGNET [was Re: TLC sends people to www.brickself.com]
|
|
(...) Okay, now I really have to propose this idea that's been banging around in my head for the past few weeks. The motivations come, in part, from my work organizing and grading my EQMM collection[1] and from reading the LUGNET Plan[2]. I think (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|
