 | | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
|
|
This type of speech really necessary? -- Mike Edwards Lugnet Member #151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kanohi-Power - Bionicle Site on the web (URL) shop - Edwards Parts (URL) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
(...) Agreed. (...) After waiting a couple days to see if this post would get a reply, I'm writing to voice my agreement with Larry and my disagreement with how issues like this are handled on LUGNET. In essence, by Suz stating that she doesn't want (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
(...) Well, I believe deprecated does not mean prohibited; it means that it is going to be prohibited in a future version, so you'll have to change it someday. Am I wrong about that? Does CSS offer an equivalent to this? It seems possible to me. I (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
You would be right about using the target= attribute as a backup if I was writing to the Transitional DTDs or against the loose URIs. Deprecated means I can't use the target= attribute in an XML document that validates against the DTDs for HTML 4.01 (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
The target= attribute is deprecated in HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0. If I, for whatever reason of vanity and the like, choose to write an XML document that validates against the strict DTDs, then I cannot use the target= attribute. You are correct that (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
(...) defenitly, my slip, sorry :) (...) hmmm... at least in mozilla, it doesn't create a new window. so it's only used to break out of frames, which is a very good thing for a button to do. (...) :) Dan (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
(...) JavaScript, not Java. A completely separate and unrelated language. Note that target="_top" is for frames, to load the page in the outermost frame (i.e. the whole window). For a new window, the correct value is target="_blank". If you are not (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
(...) but that will only work if the client supports java - if java is unavailable (for whatever reason), the button will act as a normal link. Why not put the target tag as a backup for the java? Dan (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
(...) For the record, I am looking for no further answer. The issue is closed as far as I am concerned. (...) I have just realised how much I have enjoyed not noticing you over the past couple of weeks. I am rather disappointed, and I must admit (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
As far as the markup for including the LUGNET buttons and banners on a web page is concerned, the target= attribute of the <a> tag is deprecated in HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0. While I explore how to replace the exact functionality of the target="_top" (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
