 | | Whatever
|
| (...) Yes, but do they care enough to do what needs to be done? And if they care, is that thing a doable thing just because they care? I don't think so. Any call for a penalty for anyone is just whistling in the wind because it's not the community (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
| "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:GnEx5o.DL7@lugnet.com... (...) I had already read that thread, and I've developed the opinion that both of you were at fault. In the spirit of letting -that- debate die, I won't elaborate (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: edventures spam
|
| (...) Lugnet isn't spam free, although I *think* it's set up to discourage robots and other automated creepy crawlies. Anyone harvesting from Lugnet would have to at least subscribe, and grab the e-mail addys from message headers. This takes out a (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: edventures spam
|
| (...) Thanks Dan and Jenn, No big deal overall (to me at least), although I must have dreamed that LUGNET was spam free. -chris (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Grow up.
|
| Look: I don't care what your opinions are and I'm not going to baby-sit. So just knock it off, and/or go away. You all know who you are. Suzanne Rich LUGNET Admin (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
|
