 | | Re: E-mail authentication during posting
|
|
(...) Sorry, I meant where it was the user's fault. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
|
|
(...) Ummm...will I do? Larry responded nicely to your post. Believe me, there are probably many sarcastic remarks being withheld on his part, in order for him to respond civily to you (and for me as well). To pick apart the message wouldn't be (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
|
|
Do me a fav, would you mind picking a part the rest of the message instead of acting like some wisecrack. I wouldn't mind hearing your reasons too. That is of course, unless you have nothing to back you besides a few angry LUGNET users who got out (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
|
|
(...) Me, for one... (...) I think so. Maybe we need to see if Kev will do a new Brickshelf poll... I bet we'd get an overwhelming positive vote. But maybe not. FUT admin.general (or should it have been NNTP??) as this is not really a .general (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can I have my password.
|
|
(...) Behind the membership card on your packet, if you ever got one!! -Shiri (25 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: UKLTC has arrived
|
|
(...) I know that this reply is late in coming, but had I asked this community if there was a 'need' for a ELTC, I would've received a response identical to my first announcement of ELTC. It took Sam's UKLTC to bring about a measure of response. We (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can I have my password.
|
|
(...) Ummm...me three, Todd? Where was this password in the first place? -- Hop-Frog (not jesting) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible bug with "Reply"-button
|
|
(...) It's not a bug, but actually a (little-known) feature of the NNTP protocol/ format: If the Followup-To header is set to "poster", then your newsreader is supposed to direct replies to the poster rather than to a newsgroup. -- Todd S. Lehman | (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail authentication during posting
|
|
(...) Did NNTP posting have this problem? Todd put a nifty little fix in for web dups a few months back. Great stuff... ++Lar (25 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Reply button test, Mark II
|
|
(...) Hunh. Exactly the same as FUT: lugnet.off-topic.test,poster It appears that it will accept "poster" as an argument in the FUT field, but will only process it as a mailto: command if it's by itself. Hunh. (25 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.admin.general)
|
