 | | CLSotW - help wanted
|
|
I could use help updating CLSotW each week. As you may have noticed, I've let it get quite behind recently, which really bothers me. The easy part each week is updating the pages...that goes pretty quick. The hard part is going through each site, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Before you post annoyance
|
|
Hey Steve! (...) I'm guessing that the problem might be your cookies. LUGNET saves your info on cookies (scrambled IIRC). So if your cookies (on explorer or Netscape) were turned off, you'd have to "remind" the server it's still you. HTH, -Shiri (25 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Before you post annoyance
|
|
Is there some sort of saved setting that I've accidentally misplaced? Every time I try to post (via the web) I have to enter my name, address and swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothin' but the truth. Even a subsequent posting within (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Adition to .loc.au info
|
|
(...) Thanks Todd, and thanks to you too Ross: seeing the link to that little page of mine made my day!! --Dave (25 years ago, 20-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Adition to .loc.au info
|
|
Hi, todd Would you be able to add (URL) Local Happenings> link to the main .loc.au page? Thanks ROSCO (25 years ago, 20-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.robotics.combat?
|
|
(...) I have to agree with that. All three of the TV shows currently all the rage which purportedly feature robotic combat, ACTUALLY feature combat by machines controlled remotely by human operators. That is downplayed in the shows, of course. So (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.robotics.combat?
|
|
(...) The *vast* majority of combat "robots" which I have seen on the net, LEGO-based or otherwise, are not autonomous. (...) Extremely impressive engineering does not necessarily make a device a robot. (...) Of course if it's autonomous and (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.robotics.combat?
|
|
(...) Because very few of them are armored RC cars. There are actually lots of autonomous combat robots, and even those that aren't "smart" have extremely impressive engineering inside. Also.. isn't the definition of a robot something that can be (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.robotics.combat?
|
|
(...) vast majority of these things simply aren't robots. Maybe in .build or something instead. Why perpetuate the fallacy that armored RC cars are really robots when they aren't. (25 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | lugnet.robotics.combat?
|
|
Fighting Lego robots seem to have gained considerable momentum recently.. just take a look at Battle Bricks (www.battlebricks.com) or Lego Robo Warriors ((URL) I was wondering if you would give any consideration to creating a group for this purpose? (...) (25 years ago, 15-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
