 | | Re: Scheduled downtime 18 Jan 2001 for memory upgrade
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G79FyJ.Ev@lugnet.com... <snip>...Downtime should be about 15 minutes. (...) Little optimistic! :) Everyone knows that to determine the true time taken to perform a hardware upgrade is (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime 18 Jan 2001 for memory upgrade
|
|
A whole 15 minutes? I hope I can last that long. But seriously take all the time you want! Waaahhhh,lol. -- Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D. "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G79FyJ.Ev@lugnet.com... (...) This (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Scheduled downtime 18 Jan 2001 for memory upgrade
|
|
On Thursday, 18 Jan 2001 at approximately 5:00 pm EST, lugnet.com will go offline briefly for a memory upgrade (adding another 640 MB of DRAM). This will involve shutting down the webservers and newsserver and physically powering down the machine. (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: Error loading page in set database
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G74zGr.CJG@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) ISP?), (...) I've talked to my ISP about site problems such as the ones Paul Baulch describes, and they say it's not uncommon to experience a lot of delays (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Error loading page in set database
|
|
(...) No, it just never completed a write operation -- random bad luck in a section of unsafe code that assumes that power won't go out or that the system doesn't melt down. I rebuilt it from redundant data in the data matrix but it should still (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
