 | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) The recent history of .debate is certainly that the types of shouting matches have little chance of being productive, however, I will point out that back some time ago, the "Libertarian" debate DID have real productivity. It DID change (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) Well, as soon as I can come up with an idea that I myself can't pick apart on 1000 levels, I will. Unfortunately, thus far I've been unsuccessful... (...) Yeah, but that's the default way of "winning" an argument or flamewar on Usenet. :D (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:>>Hey, that's a good idea- if you pay to become a Lugnet member, you're allowed (...) I'm not yet a member (mainly because most of my posting has been to OT rather than LEGO-specific contributions), (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Dot view parameterizable?? (Re: Excessive Cross Posting
|
| (...) I would like to put into the enhancement hopper the idea of setting a personal preference for how big the tree view should be allowed to get before it is suppressed. I'm willing to pay a bit more delay to get larger trees, some others may want (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) Personally, I come and go. I lose interest in some debates, and gain interest in others. Occasionally I'll see something that really does peak my interest, and other times, I just feel like debating. As to whether it's actually a waste of (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
