 | | Re: Leakage from .debate
|
| (...) No, it's a good point. I was wondering about that myself. I, of course, would like to think I'm nifty! enough that I don't let how things go in one group influence how they go in another, and especially not to the point of lambasting a (...) (26 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Leakage from .debate
|
| I don't want to drag another thread into the discussion about .debate, but in the following post: (URL) says: (...) Larry - I'm curious, do you feel that your response to Christopher may have been more harsh than it may have deserved to be, perhaps (...) (26 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
| (...) I would like to see .debate be able to exist as something worthwhile, but I sense that with each debate which explodes into a ravaging god vs science debate, we lose another of the folks who are interested in serious debate. I'm not sure how (...) (26 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
| (...) Oops. My bad. I should have caught that, but as you say, I was away for what has got to be one of the biggest weeks on l.o-t.d and was racing to mow through hundreds of posts. At this point I'm overwhelmed and haven't even looked at the (...) (26 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
| (...) Some thoughts: - I've wondered if .debate should have a no-crossposting rule, except for crossposting in (which can easily be checked, for a post to be accepted which is cross-posted in .debate and any other group, it must be a followup to a (...) (26 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
