 | | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) One person said that, but I'm not sure how serious they were. A couple of other people hinted at it. Two or three people (I think two) said that they would set up a killfile. (...) I don't think they meant it as a threat. I certainly didn't (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
Interesting discussion. It just raised a parallel issue which gives us a precedent to look at. That precedent is auctions. Todd has made it quite clear that pointing to an auction website in a group which doesn't welcome auction posts is fine when (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Which is a succinct way of saying that he was basically a jerk. :) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I think you may have misunderstood why I mentioned your member number (note I didn't mention mine). I also don't think your number should necessarily indicate you have some sort of status or "power" here. I referenced it simply because I (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Gee, Lar--why do I have the feeling that this isn't an entirely hypothetical example? 8^) Dave! (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) So would I. Of course, discussing it would imply the person with the negative opinion was around to discuss it. :D I'm really not saying that you should be forced to agree in any way with anything anyone says, or that you should not have the (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes: <snip> (...) That statement I would not take as being a threat but like I said I don't know what people said to Todd privately and I assume there were many people writing Todd privately about the topic (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
(...) For the non-numeric among us: 0 - Black 1 - Blue 2 - Green 3 - Teal 4 - Red 5 - Dark Pink 6 - Brown 7 - Light Gray 8 - Dark Gray 9 - Light Blue 10 - Bright/Light Green 11 - Turquoise 12 - Scala Salmon (I'm winging it. This color is not a very (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
(...) These are great. Todd, might you have a few minutes to write a Random Part/Colour Generator like the Random Set Name Generator? Idea stimulants for CAD builders! By the way, these are nice for fountains: (URL) Heather -- Heather Patey Pirate (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) People seem to be suggesting, though, that one should not choose to voice that opinion. If person A can voice an opinion that persons B, C, and D find offensive (and to be honest - persons E, F, and G couldn't care less about) I'd say B, C, or (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
