 | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) strongly (...) to (...) Well it wasn't *intended* as a witch hunt. More of a rhetorical question, because i'm not sure there *are* any people who still feel that someone should be tossed soley for opinions. <snip Mike's eloquent distinction (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) And/or perhaps in some cases overstated. Or overly stressed. (...) I sent Todd a few private e-mails on this subject (most of which dealt pretty specifically with apologizing for blowing my top and asking him to remove my emotionally charged (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) So would I. No one ever said you couldn't choose who to like and who not to like. (...) Actually, if I felt that way, yeah, I would be ashamed of myself. (...) Just because he may have been here on Lugnet doesn't mean you *must* associate with (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Wow, what a loaded question, especially given what seems(ed) like a reverse- witch-hunt. I'd like to state first that I realized Friday that I got WAY too worked up about this and posted some things that were, in some cases, petty and (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Actually I'm not including myself to that a few remaining, but in case of any doubt, here is my reasoning, in which I tried to word it as much clear as possible: (URL) there is any flaws, replies would be really appreciated. Selçuk (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) I just wanted to add that I agree with Eric J. once again. I know I and a few others were playing a bit of devils advocate durring this discussion. Thats mostly because I thought several peoples reasoning for banishment were misguided. There (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> That rocks, man! Way cool. Thanks, Steve and Todd. (...) waterfall in a diorama. (GMLTC didn't have a waterfall in the last layout for lack of trans blue bricks, and for lack of place to put it) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) I agree. However... I think that there were people who felt that way initially, but that many, if not all, have come around to reject that view. And that's a good thing. For the few remaining, can you identify yourselves and post reasons why (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
| How 'bout Chrome BURPS!!? (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
| (...) Full-on swingage! OK, I see the other colors there too now. Man, this fully rocks! These are nice and very small and _very_ quick to load. (...) Yup, that's great. (...) Fine too! (...) OK, I got 'em up now, and the URLs go like this: (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
|
