 | | Re: A reixamination of what happened.
|
| (...) That would be censorship. No. (...) Even if it _didn't_ have LEGO material, they wouldn't get banned simply for posting a site address, no. Hopefully of course they wouldn't be posting such an address with malicious intentions to injure others (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Agreed. I went and looked using the search function. I may have missed some but I found a number of posts from Matthew going quite a ways back. Some were hyperbolic, but none (that I found, but I may have missed some) were vitriolic. Nothing (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) I'm sure the phrase "new member" must means different things to different people -- perhaps two weeks to one person, two months to another, or even two years to another. In any case, for the record, Matthew's first post here was on April 9, (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Let's not forget this. John, thanks for drawing attention to this passage. --Todd (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: people.newbie
|
| "Frank Buiting" <frank.buiting@infopulse.nl> wrote in message news:G2uFAt.ABA@lugnet.com... (...) organises (...) it (...) Oops! I didn't notice the 'New user? Come introduce yourself...' link on the news page! Ignore the above paragraph. -Frank (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
