 | | Re: pw checking (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1L15F.K94@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) client (...) if (...) to (...) been (...) reason. (...) follow (...) it (...) Why would it have been a mistake to protect them? IMHO, if anyone can fake a (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Nuke Boston (was Re: Resolved: Tall SUVs should not be...)
|
| (...) True - I actually went to .fun first, but didn't think a joke fit into Community, Gaming, Party, Crafts, or Holiday, and didn't realize that I could post directly to .fun, because when I had tried to post directly to (IIRC) .marketplace, it (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Set List Question
|
| I noticed that I can go back and edit what I wrote in...so I have done that. -- Thomas Main main@appstate.edu (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | pw checking (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
|
| (...) Well, enough new things that I think it will be hard for anyone to continue belittling the checking anymore. Plus, as I said before, it's possible (and likely, I hope) that the checking will be less stringent. Right now I'm guesstimating that (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) I was thinking more from the perspective of what you are going to create that will have a span of 9 months and not what might happen on the internet outside of LUGNET in 9 months. This still doesn't explain why you have a sophisticated (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
