 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Whatever. But the issue remains, whose responsibility is it to ensure email communication works? LUGNET and the LUGNET admins? Or the user? This issue has come up before and while the admins will do what they can, it's not their responsibility (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) I'm sure you do. (21 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) That's not accurate. What IS accurate is that when I discovered there was a problem, I talked to my support and based on what they told me then, I said to you that the problem was at your end. Later on, you insinuated that I was deliberately (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
| (...) I don't think that looking at only priveledges is a more accurate way to look at these issues. I think you only address part of the issue. The P&P and ToU already define everything as priveledges, but this means they can be taken away. Rights (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Yes, I know this, *and* I knew it that time that Larry tried to make it look like my fault by saying the problem was on my end. Have to admit, he's good at spin. (...) I don't won't accept any unofficial email warnings. Otherwise the emails (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
