 | | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Maybe. But then abuse of the system would lead to time-outs, would it not? If the admins start to see the page leading to too much abuse, I guess maybe then would be a good time to look at removing it. (...) I don't think this is a question of (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) My entrie (first) post was about weighting and spotlighting. Nothing in the post was outside of that context, so there was no need to assume there was any more, or different, meaning to it. And no, I did not mean I wanted to see more of any (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) I would think that making the weightings available to the public would lead to temptation to abuse the system. IMO. For all I know, though, the entire LUGNET community is 100% Grade A honest. Anyway, my 2. -Vince (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) I don't know. Good question. I think you could argue that both ways, but probably it's a good idea. (...) Putting some regularization into the process seems a good idea to me, so ya, there should be. Up till now it has been ad hoc though, I (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) A couple of questions: Will these weightings be made available on a page somewhere so everyone can see them anytime? Is there a policy in place to regularly look at these weightings and make adjustments if deemed necessary? Thanks ROSCO (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
