 | | LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
|
LUGNET administration has always had the ability to temporarily or permanently suspend the posting privileges of a user or member. In the past this has been only very rarely used. The mechanism for doing so was such that only Todd (or for a time, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Well, yeah. (...) To be honest, I don't think there should be one either, but essentially that's what the system is doing right now anyway. Whoever decided that "all posts to .lego should be -1" and "all posts to .color should be -2" clearly (...) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights
|
|
(...) I think I agree. (...) I'm not sure I like this idea - here we are all AFOLs, I see no reason to treat official TLC announcements any different. If we get the rankings right, there should be no need. (...) I would be fairly strongly against (...) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) The weights today are global, there is no facility for an admin to adjust weights on a post other than by voting him or herself (or not voting). Nor do I think there should be one. I honestly enjoy some of the debating and whatnot too, but you (...) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Huh! So-- if Jake made an announcement about, say, new bulk pack sets in "klassik grey" (or if new colors were switched back to old) and posted to .announce, .color, and .lego, the net result would be a -1 default? I think I like all of the (...) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
