 | | Re: Are custom made parts LEGO?
|
|
(...) It was a mistake, with no overt or covert subtheme to the truncation that I am aware of. Apologies for any confusion or false inferences drawn. (...) I truly hadn't thought about it. That may be too compartmentalised even for me. (...) Yes. (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are custom made parts LEGO?
|
|
(...) Interesting that you truncated the group's title, and not a bad truncation at that! IMO formal clone *brands* should be generally confined to ot.clone-brands, but one-shot modifications are an artistic creation of their own and I agree with (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are custom made parts LEGO?
|
|
(...) What follows is my opinion, not any sort of Lugnet Admin official stance by any means... I think there's a need for a custom parts discussion group but I'm not sure it belongs under off-topic. You can argue it both ways. This argument has in (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for deletion of second post
|
|
(...) Good idea, and easy to do since it's just an alias. Has been talked about before, time to bring it up again internally. (...) This is a bit harder to implement but in my view a worthy suggestion. (...) As is this. (22 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
