 | | Re: REPLY BACK
|
| (...) You'll hear no disagreement from me. I guess I just don't see the value add (given that there are no other lists that this is done for). (22 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: REPLY BACK
|
| (...) LUGNET has a better mechanism for "subscribe as mailing list." Why keep this anachronistic exception around, gatewaying to an outside mailing list? If that list can't control its spam then I suggest LUGNET should pull the plug on the gateway, (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: REPLY BACK
|
| (...) Can these obviously spam messages at least be canceled? -Tim (22 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: to Todd: How did THIS get on LUGNET?!
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys wrote: SNIP (...) SNIP (...) thanks for the info. i don't usually read .robotics, bur saw this while browsing news & was worried it would be a beigger problem, but as long as somebody knows it's going on & it's (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: REPLY BACK
|
| "Eric Kingsley" <kingsley@nelug.org> wrote in message news:Hw6BMu.114y@lugnet.com... (...) As has been pointed out, this came from the robotics e-mail list. Nothing Lugnet can do without extraordinary filtering. Frank (22 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
