 | | Re: fun with LUGNET web site statistics
|
| Thanks for posting these. Although I have absolutely no use for them I find statistics facinating. I had a brief look at the Korean pages you mentioned, all seem very professional but of course completely unintelligable (even with the Korean fonts (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
| (...) Our company decided that all of the webhosters are too restrictive, so we went the serverhosting way, where man can have lots of freedom without any additional payments. RH Enterprise + 700gbs of traffic monthly for relatively low price. I can (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
| (...) From a technical point of view, nothing at all. And maybe Pair would be cool about it, I dunno. ISPs like to charge for stuff like that, is all. Hopefully, we'll eventually have an arrangement which gives us more control. (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
| (...) ? I'm for moderation. But _everybody_ would be one. You'd vote for 'offtopic', I'd vote for 'offtopic', somebody else would do so... and voila, link is removed. The only problem remains in setting the good rules with good weights. (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
| (...) Why frame this negatively with the words 'power centralization?' Think ... what 'power' would link administrators have? Approve/reject links to be made public. Its in the best interest of creating a comprehensive directory to link to as many (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
|
