 | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
| (...) I've been a 'member' for a while and I couldn't give a rip for a 'packet'. The pros of LUGNET by far outweigh the "at the time was a good idea but now that it's only Todd and time marches on so, eh, whatrya gonna do?" missing membership (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
| (...) Oh please. Todd asked for some constructive input and volunteers to help improve on LUGNET, and you totally sidestep the point of his post and use this as an opportunity to take a pot shot at it. If you want to point out problems, I for one (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
| So what was all this about? (URL) have two words to explain why some people are getting disatisfied with LUGNET: "membership packet" (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | New homepage for LUGNET
|
| Someone brought this up at BrickFest PDX and others agreed it would be an excellent idea: Rather than mainly linking to internal LUGNET resources, the first thing someone should see when they visit the LUGNET homepage is iconic links to other major (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, FTX) !!
| | | | | Re: INVESTMENT ASSISTANCE
|
| (...) all. And of course, there's other kinds of spam as well. I don't think the mailing list link should be severed, but it'd be nice if the list had tighter policies. (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
