Subject:
|
Re: more scan questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:18:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
182 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, Jennifer L. Boger writes:
> do you compare ones that we send to the existing set pictures and choose
> from there?
Yeah...
> We're sending the front page of the instruction sheets, and in a few
> cases, the front of the box or a picture of a tub or bucket. is there
> anything else we need to know? is there a size limitation you'd like?
> (we're trying to stay less than 60K each) is there a graphic size you'd
> like us to try and stay with? (i think the biggest one is like 500x350 or
> something). Please let us know :) thanks! (sorry so spammy)
Well, I'd say try to stay under 200KB and under ~600x600 pixels, and avoid
progressive JPEGs[1]. Other than than, not much to worry about. I'll be
putting in some scaling stuff to make medium-sized images so that the huge
ones don't get in the way like they do now. (The large original versions
will stay around of course if someone wants to click to get the huger view.)
--Todd
[1] These are cool per se, but not all browsers support them yet, and they're
better off as an output option rather than input, especially because non-
progressive JPEGs are much easier to manipulate with image-processing tools
via scripts.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | more scan questions
|
| Ok, thanks for fixing the incoming thing. Dan and I hope to start sending bunchs of "scans" (they're not really scans, their pictures, but i can't tell the difference, i hope you can't :) ) anyway... do you compare ones that we send to the existing (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
