 | | Re: Unique keys for sets —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) Not a scream, just a squeak. Consider 9, as in last and keep it last if you add something else. It has less useful info to most readers and thus should be in the region the eye reads last. (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Unique keys for sets —Remy Evard
| | | | | lpieniazek@novera.com (Larry Pieniazek) wrote in <386943AA.328BCF33@v...ager.net>: (...) If the key you're talking about is in the form of "8880-1", then I think column 1 makes sense. I would actually be quite happy with that as a solution for a (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Unique keys for sets —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) OK, it's in column 9 now (the rightmost). Enjoy. --Todd (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | | |
