| |
In lugnet.general, Selçuk Göre writes:
> > Huw made a mistake, <snip>
>
> This is not fair. Nobody sure that it was a mistake rigt now. It's been
> suggested that it MIGHT BE a mistake, since nobody knows anything about the
> (consistent) policy of TLC about vendor catalogs.
Well, let's get something straight here first:
1. TLC's policy about vendor/retailer catalogs is only half of the issue.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out that something known as a
"retailer catalog" (which consumers almost *never* see) is not intended
for consumers ever to see.
2. Posting scans of portions of a retailer catalog -- including major leaks
about upcoming product lines and details -- *before* those product lines
have been released officially -- is the other half of the issue.
Those are two separate things.
We haven't heard from TLC conclusively on #1, but like I said, it doesn't
take a genius to figure out that it's probably not really a good idea. On
top of that, if Suzanne says is something like that is wrong, I can be sure
(without any doubt whatsoever in my mind) that it's wrong.
> PS. Todd, Could you please check the message with subject "Update info for
> Lugnet Database Volume V" that I've posted last year to admin.database. If
> it is not appropriate to publish vendors' catalogs, I think we should do
> something more..:-(
OK, I just dug that up,
http://www.lugnet.com/admin/database/?n=52
and, Hmmm, yes, very good point; we should be extra cautious here, in
retrospect.
Selçuk, to the best of your knowledge, are there photos of any sets there
which:
- never eventually appeared in a consumer product line, and
- never were mentioned in published in any LEGO advertising, and
- contain sensitive LEGO-internal information
?
From the looks of it (looking up about 10 of the sets at random), the answer
looks like 'no' since each image in the DB is a highly-cropped scan showing
simply a photo of the box -- nothing sensitive or secret. I'll go through
them in more detail tomorrow. Maybe others can have a look too and see if
there's anything questionable.
Thanks for bringing it up,
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
| ----- Original Message ----- From: Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> (...) This is not fair. Nobody sure that it was a mistake rigt now. It's been suggested that it MIGHT BE a mistake, since nobody knows anything about the (consistent) policy of TLC (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
