Subject:
|
Re: Parts naming conventions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Jul 1999 00:10:09 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.com{antispam}
|
Viewed:
|
623 times
|
| |
|
|
Jim Hughes wrote:
<snip>
> I suspect that all 3000 or so Lego elements probably boil down to about 100-200
> root elements.
Right. And you could denote whether a thingabob was vertical or
horizontal with a variant on the cis/trans nomenclature as well, instead
of using vertical. if we agreed that "cis" (or whatever we picked) meant
an element in the horizontal plane that gripped a rod vertically and so
forth it would stop the quibbling about vertical meaning orientation of
the thing or orientation of what it gripped.
>
> What this really drives at is the need for a well though out set of element
> roots, or in other words an element classification or taxonomy. I suspect this
> would be the hard part of such a project, although
> If properly constructed individual element naming would be relatively easy once
> you agreed on the classification of an element. Beyond this however is that it
> would be easy to see the variations and relations between elements.
>
> After all of this you can relate back any common or particularly descriptive
> names.
>
> If this whole thing was done right you would be able to figure out the name of
> any element you had and figure out the element from any name you had, which
> would be useful for any reason, such as auctions, L-draw, inventories,
> whatever.
>
> Jim
> hughesj@one.net
> http://w3.one.net/~hughesj/technica/technica.html
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Parts naming conventions
|
| (...) Exactly. If everyone assumes a set starting orientation, such as the word "lego' on the studs is right side up readable from left to right then it would be trivial top decide upon a convention for describing a particular side or top/bottom. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Parts naming conventions
|
| I didn't know exactly where this fit into the thread so I just started a new one. Read with interest the discussion of part naming conventions as this is something I have been (trying) to deal with for several years as part of my element registry. (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
