Subject:
|
Re: Problem solved! (was: Is there a problem with the Lugnet sets database search engine?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:54:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2969 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, Dan Boger wrote:
| |
Seems to work for me - what specific query are you trying?
|
Hello Dan,
It works for me too, now.
Why don’t I just kill myself...?
...for trying to look for sets that simply don’t exist and then complain about
it not working! Stupid me; I simply made typo’s when I tried to get an overview
of the 2005 X-pods; one of them carries set number 4413 and the other 3 sets
start with 43xx, *not* 44xx as I was trying... ooops!
So, the query I kept trying was 4413,4437-4439 but should of course have been
4413,4337-4339 or one of the likes...
Thanks anyway & my apologies!
I think I better get some rest first...
Erik B
If there’s a problem, first ask yourself this (from a technical POV):
-Is it the Machine? In this case: my computer?
-Is it the Material? In this case: the Lugnet software?
-Is it the (hu)Man? In this case: me, the user?
-Is it the Method? In this case: the application of the above means?
In this case it were the last 2 options, which gave me a 50% chance of it being
the Machine and/or the Material...
...Next time I’ll ask myself these questions *before* I post such messages.
(Still, it makes me wonder why the Arachno X-pod has such a deviating set
number? ;-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
