Subject:
|
Re: New Dacta sets for the database
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Sun, 11 Apr 2004 03:42:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
665 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, Thomas Garrison wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Clark Stephens wrote:
>
> > 1053 3+ Small Universal Set - 134 elements
>
> No, this set has 886 pieces
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=12074
> The set with 134 elements is 1055.
Oops, my typo. Thanks for the correction. But if you go by the Lugnet guide for
1055, this set must have very small parts.
> And for more fun Dacta-diving, don't forget
> http://homepages.cwi.nl/~dik/english/LEGO/setlist.html
Yeah, seen that list before, but didn't know if it was reliable enough for
Lugnet inclusion. So far, I've only submitted pictured sets.
If that is a good enough source, I'll hack it against a set list and post the
unmatched number list here. The matched numbered sets with differing names are
often difficult to tell if it is actually a new set, a translation difference
from the source, or a rename by Lego for a new market.
Is there a way to get a plain text listing of just set numbers and names listed
on Lugnet?
Thanks,
Clark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
