 | | scans for 4239 —Cary Clark
| | | | I noticed that 4239 doesn't have a picture, so I scanned the polybag (much harder to do than I imaged) and uploaded it here: (URL) poked around but didn't find the instructions for how to submit an image. I noticed that images in the set database (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: scans for 4239 —Dan Boger
| | | | | (...) thanks! picture uploaded. From what I know, the thumbnails are generated automagically by the server... so the original should be (imo) as large as is reasonable... so when people do want to see more detail than the thumbnail, they should have (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: scans for 4239 —Suzanne D. Rich
| | | | | (...) that's right. (...) another way to look at it is: it depends on what the image's contents call for. there's a point where a larger image isn't better, just bigger. Likewise, an image should have enough info so there isn't a big question, like, (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | | |
