 | | Re: Announcing new set database
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1uDHF.77t@lugnet.com... (...) It's beautifull! Thanks! BTW, do you ever sleep? Whenever i ask a question, you respond imediately. I thought you were in the US, and considering the timezone (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new set database
|
|
(...) Kinda rough around the edges, but anyway: (URL) it's updated once per hour. (...) 9 times out of 10 it's larger -- but it's always the original size of the original image uploaded, so sometimes it might not be bigger (and in some really funky (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new set database
|
|
"Todd & Suz" <admin@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:G0wo9C.B4I@lugnet.com... (...) by (...) Lugnet admin. Would it be possible to see some statistics for the sets? "The most owned set by LUGNET members", "The best looking set ever, acoording to (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Writing A Proposal
|
|
(...) Ugh, that's what I was afraid of. This means it would be really nice to have the info in the lugnet database .... (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | #1450, #8516, #880010-880012
|
|
Hi all, I found several new sets at TRU (in Germany) today. I made some scans but haven't written anything about them yet. However, here you will find a few images: (URL) There are new combo packs available which cover the 6-digit-area. These were (...) (24 years ago, 30-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general, lugnet.technic) !
|
| |
| | Re: new set number for item 1181
|
|
(...) 1266 exists... am i missing something? (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | new set number for item 1181
|
|
Reference: (URL) the reference above for info I have provided there. The copies I have of set 1266 were purchased approx. 10 weeks ago. Have not been able to locate additional copies. __Kevin Salm__ (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) FYI I did type in 1 through 8 and expected to see the latest McD promo's. After all, that is the most obvious number on there. Just because it's a single digit does not take away from it's significance as a set identifier. KL (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
| |
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) Yup, I think it's weird too. (...) I think they're also that. :-) Remember the SHELL promo sets from 1998? They had both low-numbered SHELL numbers (1-10 or something like that) and 4-digit LEGO set numbers on the instructions. For example, (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
| |
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
while I agree that the numbers don't seem quite right, I don't think it really matters... my reasoning is this: The numbers are entered in the DB only so people can find the sets they're looking for. If I have a box with 8448 on it, I'd never find (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
