| | Re: Set additions / updates
|
|
(...) Earliest recorded/provable date, in any market. --Todd (25 years ago, 14-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Set additions / updates
|
|
I believe he uses the "catalog year" the set first appeared in the US. That may or may not be the same as the copyright on the box, or the copyright on the instructions. KL (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Set additions / updates
|
|
Some updates for the set database from info I got from a lot of sealed sets I got from 1979-82: NOTE: I'm not sure if the date listed on Lugnet represents the year available in the US or the year of the copyright on the package. The dates I've (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Arctic is Town (was: Re: My Analysis of the 2000 Sets)
|
|
(...) year (...) Where did this come from? I haven't seen anything that says "Futbol" in the catalog, and frankly, I don't think Lego would be dumb enough to refer to the soccer sets this way in the US. It would create way to much confusion. Jeff (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Arctic is Town (was: Re: My Analysis of the 2000 Sets)
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote: <snipped well mapped out discussion of set numbering theory> (...) OK, I have looked at the new catalog in some detail but I can't see where everybody is getting the label "Futbol" for these sets. I am obviously overlooking (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.database)
|