|
|
 | | Re: 1593 box photos! (was: Re: you guys noticed this auction? - Wow!)
|
| First I have to apologize to Dave for outbidding him. I hated doing that, but with the rest of my collection nearly complete, I had to get this set. As most of us know how rare this set is, I doubt that we'll ever see another one...with that said I (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Re: Top 50 LEGO sets of all time
|
| (...) *chuckle* From the looks of it, neither do I. 497 was the US number on the set, 928 was the international number. :) -JDF (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
| (...) Ok, so I'll fix the 2_7 - but does that mean that 105 has 184 pieces too? Dan (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
| (...) Just a little curious if this tidbit will be acted upon. (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Re: 4.5v vs 12
|
| (...) I think this is a very good idea - I was always bothered by the fact that when I'm looking for an accessory pack, I may have to look in three subgroups instead of one... :) Dan (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
