Subject:
|
Re: Larry's Posts (was Re: Australian Brickbay Shops)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.curators
|
Date:
|
Sun, 29 Jul 2001 23:01:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1835 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.curators, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > I hear he wants to be curator for Scala..
> Not that there's anything wrong with that.. ;-)
> > I know that was a facetious comment (it got me laughing pretty easily)
> > but seriously... [..]
> > I'm thinking curatorship can be handed off, (yes?), but am not sure if
> > getting lots of curators fast and rejiggering is better or worse than
> > getting the right curator (and maybe waiting a bit longer to get the
> > "perfect" one). What was your thinking on that Suzanne?
>
> [checking] 'rejiggering' really -is- a word.. wow. :-)
>
> I'm not in a hurry to find curators, no. In fact the only ones I'm setting up
> right now are a few that were specifically asked for, and some I'd hoped to
> assign. We'll see how it goes with those.
Nods... no sense rushing in. Also the trailblazers can share experience with
those that come after or who are wondering what it entails. Any thoughts on
whether a co-curatorship is even doable?
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
2 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
