To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: post frequency
 Results 161 – 180 of about 37000.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) I'm the 5th. <grin> And that's after shutting up for almost 6 months. -Shiri (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
It's fun to read the list, silently, while the TV announces the Rose Bowl player lineups! Da ta da... (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G6I5qC.BxE@lugnet.com... (...) So really you're probably close to first, if you took a snapshot of the time you were posting all day long. I'm surprised I'm at 16th (I thought I'd clear the top (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Yes. (...) It's that too. Scroll down farther. --Todd (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Hmm, interesting. I guess I've got some catching up to do... I arbitrarily only grabbed those who posted at least 1000 times. I recognize most of those as regular posters, but a few I don't recognize as regular posters, but only one do I not (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) you (...) as (...) Well, we all know Lar likes to hear himself talk... We really should create lugnet.lar... Do you read .trains much? Many of the folks who have you beat are active in .trains. I'm not really surprised by any of the folks who (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:G6Irwu.I8E@lugnet.com... (...) Of course! :-) (...) the (...) Funny you mention, I just started reading .trains this week. I was subscribed to trains.org but after seeing a lot of (whaddya (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
Todd Lehman wrote: 1026 Selçuk Göre 1030 Terry Keller 1117 Christopher L. Weeks Hmm, 30th place..:-) I didn't expect that, I didn't think that I was one of the big mouths..:-) 1208 Kevin Wilson 1258 John VanZwieten 1286 Mark Sandlin 1311 Jasper (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) It's not about quantity, it's about quality. You have no catching up to do on that score. ++Lar (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Ya, basically. Or if they changed their last name due to marriage, etc. (...) Well, lessee... Ed Boxer shows up a couple ways: 19 Ed "Boxer" Jones 505 Ed Jones I think the count of 22 for Robin is right...at least, the search engine agrees: (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Well, in your case quantity and quality have gone hand in hand, of course. :) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) We're not sure exactly *where* they've gone, however. <GDR> ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Uh oh, time for a blood transfusion! 6302/178707 = 3.5% 19/178707 = .01% 19*19/178707 = .2% --Todd (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.people)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Wow. 29th place. That is surprising - especially since I've been so quiet lately. I must have blabbed too much early on... :-) -- Terry K -- (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Heeeheeee... I mean, c'mon, Steve, you even surpassed me!! Then again, you've posting here from the start, IIRC?... -Shiri (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G6r00q.8MJ@lugnet.com... (...) Yeah, Steve, and we all know how hard that is to do!! :D (I'll spare my next logical comment, because I fear my life when I get back to Boston) (...) I believe he (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
In lugnet.people, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> Wow, I've been (mostly) away for almost a year and I'm still the #31 in the list of noisemakers: *fear* :-) Richard (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) <snipped the LONG list> (...) I notice this last one was done last January 1st. Are you Todd, or anyone else who may be involved now, going to do an updated one now that it's been another year? Maggie C. (M.C. also stands for Moderately (...) (23 years ago, 30-Dec-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) what was I thinking! must have not recovered from new years yet... 121335 posts - redoing the rest of the stats... sorry for the goof... Dan (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
Dan, please tell me I'm confused and not reading this right. A year ago Todd posted this: (...) have (...) And now this year you have posted this: (...) yesterday... (...) Does this really mean that posters have dropped from about 3000 to just over (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

frequency
(score: 1.983)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR