|
 | | Wal-mart and TRU sales through Thursday April 22
|
| This weeks Wal-mart flyer, good through Thursday April 22. Note this flyer is for the "EL-NB-PEI-NS-NL" region and the fine print claims it might not be good for stores outside the distribution area of this flyer. 25% off LEGO Bionicles, now (...) (14 years ago, 18-Apr-10, to lugnet.loc.ca)
| |
|  
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: Does LDD's LDraw importer actually work?
|
| --snip-- (...) Well it's definitely not overlap then. I assume that both coloured 1x1s exist too... Did you try removing the superfluous fractional digits? I'm relying on hunches here and don't have LDD installed but I do remember weird problems to (...) (15 years ago, 22-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.ldd, FTX)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: Does LDD's LDraw importer actually work?
|
| (...) I've never had it properly confirmed but I'm fairly certain the problem with import is that the overlap detection is way too overzealous. Which means that when you read in a file it decides the parts conflict and can't be there. It's (...) (15 years ago, 22-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.ldd, FTX)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: Developing LDBoxer Again
|
| (...) --snip-- (...) This sounds like an excellent development. I had to hand alter some of my Boxer'd MOCs to get the bottom detailing back in. And I think I forgot some. Tim (15 years ago, 21-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) That's a really good explanation of why the 'rules and regulations' have grown alongside the part library and software. Tim (15 years ago, 21-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: 8258
|
| (...) I don't know if it's considered cheap, but you can still get it in some dutch online shops for around 130 euro. You can still order it on the dutch (select netherlands in the country box) Lego site aswell for 160 euro. So, I don't know where (...) (14 years ago, 28-Apr-10, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | SLTC Woodford 24th April Show - Cancelled
|
| Good day fellow Lego fanatics, The SLTC Woodford display on this weekend has been cancelled. The organisers cancelled the show due to the poor health of some of the volunteers at the Woodford National Trust property. INSTEAD: One SydLUG member, (...) (14 years ago, 21-Apr-10, to lugnet.loc.au)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| In lugnet.cad, Dave Schuler wrote: --snip-- (...) I think I see a bit better what you were getting at (and what Tore is getting at too which is the same issue I think). I kind of do agree with you both that making new parts is too hard due in part (...) (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Welcome back. My issue with that is that it's out of the hands of LDraw. It's hard to expect the people responsible for LUGNET to make big changes when it's pretty much just one small section that is active. Tim (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Possibly so but I'm of the opinion that those that make and share the parts are entitled to some narcissism. And I speak having done minimal part authoring in quite some time (due to laziness) so it's not self-interest at work. --snip-- Your (...) (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| --snip-- (...) Please excuse ne while I become really blunt ;) That information isn't there for the end users. It's there for the people volunteering their time to make the parts. As Philo said it's very easy to add automatically with DATHeader and (...) (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| --snip-- (...) I must admit that I hadn't realised it was so hard to post now. That, IMO, means we need somewhere new to discuss LDraw. If new people can't easily post in discussions then we are killing fresh discussion and that is a very bad move. (...) (15 years ago, 19-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: 8258
|
| (...) What do you consider reasonable? This set sold out very quickly and rumor has it that no more will be produced. This means that it is already a collectible item. The longer you wait to get it the more it will cost. I doubt you will find one (...) (14 years ago, 27-Apr-10, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: Password Change
|
| (...) This question still needs to be answered. I recently was able to get my password reset and log back on to update my set list. However, how does one go about changing one's own password!?! The note I got from Rene when he emailed me my new (...) (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Also threads with recent discssion are marked visually as being such and there's an Active Topics list available next to View New Posts. I'm going to be a little stirring here and suggest that possibly many of the same people demanding that (...) (15 years ago, 17-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Group discussion comments are very searchable ((URL) Image comments aren't which I agree can be frustrating. And flickr is very good at telling you where there is activity. Which isn't to say it's a good place to discuss LDraw. It is not. The (...) (15 years ago, 17-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
