Subject:
|
Re: Developing LDBoxer Again
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:29:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
24140 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> After seven years of thinking and hesitating, I have decided to improve my
> utility progam LDBoxer. There are lots of room for improvements, but to begin
> with, I will fix a couple of bugs I have discovered.
> Then I will focus on making two new categories of boxed parts:
> * Parts with studs on top but the rest boxed.
> * Parts with bottom details but without studs.
--snip--
> /Tore
This sounds like an excellent development. I had to hand alter some of my
Boxer'd MOCs to get the bottom detailing back in. And I think I forgot some.
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Developing LDBoxer Again
|
| (...) Thanks, Tim! Along with a couple of bug fixes, support for the two other categories is now implemented. Right now, I'm creating the studless parts for the \B folder. Without them, LDBoxer would still not be able to boxer them. /Tore (14 years ago, 21-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Developing LDBoxer Again
|
| After seven years of thinking and hesitating, I have decided to improve my utility progam LDBoxer. There are lots of room for improvements, but to begin with, I will fix a couple of bugs I have discovered. Then I will focus on making two new (...) (14 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
