|
 | | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) agreed under the back knob you can see the ball-pin the front knob is connected to it but the front knob seems to be enable to move in one direction only (...) i agree when i sharp a little bit the picture then it shows part-studs of engine (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|  
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) So what your saying is 'I Hope lego do a bad job because I'll get the parts I want' :-). Even if that's not what you actually mean. I just buy them off Ebay, I have loads. (...) Check out this link (URL) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: What a downer :-(
|
| (...) The sad truth is that Technic is DEAD. I don’t want to believe it. But it’s true. I think the Lego Company is making a huge mistake by ignoring the Technic market. The whole reason I got into Lego was because Mindstorms and Technic. Now my (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) I'm not sure about that, perhaps the liftarm is just to support the knob. (...) I think the red thing is just the handle at the end of the hose. (...) That was also my initial thought. But... I think it's too good to be true. (...) Wow! What a (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) This is what I think of when I think of LEGO Technic models. This has a very realistic look to it. Very well done! Someone once asked me why I felt so strongly that the Jack Stone series was a bad move for the company. I told them that, "it (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) Yes, or ARFF's as they are affectionately known. But I should have qualified my proposal by saying, "if you asked the general public." Larry, you are far too knowledgeable when it comes to transportation, vehicles etc. to not see the vague (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) Really? See the link near the bottom of this post. I think a lot of them are still traditional red, or often bright yellow. Just my opinion, I really can't back this up with any data. (...) Mechanism to do what do you think? I figure the two (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) Of course you do... why wouldn't you? ;) Don't worry Larry, I'm not interested in making this into a federal case. You make good points and I am not going to just pretend that my opinion is the only one. I certainly don't want to offend anyone (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| "Avi Parvin" <parvin@netvision.net.il> wrote in message news:H8B4pB.n5@lugnet.com... (...) solved (...) to (...) Th family car is an idea I like to see more of too. But, let's take a moment to look at the auto manufactures and market consists of in (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) Sorry, I didn't mean to give the wrong impression. I'm quite fond of the 'real' crash trucks. I think they are a wonderful blend of function vs. form. They are superbly rugged looking... something the LEGO model lacks woefully. It wasn't the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) O.K. I'm willing to bend on the lime green thing. At least that they are out there and in use. It's hard to argue with eyewitness sightings. But it doesn't mean I have to like it. :) (...) Wow. I'm not sure the trend has been as popular in (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: Technic is not dead!!!
|
| (...) Yes, on second thought, that makes more sense. I guess I was just seeing the wheels and not thinking of much else. Allan B. (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) This is very likely. :) However, I really needed to do a double take to identify this ambulance yesterday. It simply didn't stand out against the other traffic, the grey of the sky or the snow. Not nearly as much as I would think it should. I (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: Electronic brick (1968) schematics?
|
| (...) Hi Stefan, as far as I know a German fellow has done so. His nick at 1000steine is "Rat" and he his the one, who has produced Aluminium rims for the 392 wheels. You may try to contact him via this contact form (click on envelope) (URL) From (...) (17 years ago, 23-Jul-07, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
beneke
(score: 1.048)
|
|
| | Re: Things I should never do....
|
| (...) Funny you should mention that one - I have one in the cupboard above my head. I originally used it with my Amiga, then as a TV off a VCR. The power button eventually failed and turned out to be some sort of non-standard part that couldn't be (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.047)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| I am happy to see both sets. I agree that the backhoe is the better of the two, but I will plan on getting at least one of each. Every set I have put together has taught me something; I am sure the fire truck (however futuristic? they made it look) (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.047)
|
