 | | Re: Trying to understand dynamic loading
|
|
(...) Yes (...) Yes (...) I have not tried it and the downloader task seams to be disabled while a program is running. I'll hope, i can find time to read the source :) (...) Aehhhhh yes, maybe, i think so. .) (...) Yes Greetings Carsten ps: (...) (26 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Not really Lego-related, but...
|
|
(...) G&S IS good, not evil... :-) (26 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| |
| | Re: Pantograph powered LEGO trains?
|
|
(...) Have thought about it.. some non LEGO elements would be required as there is no exposed conductor wire available from LEGO and no easy way to get current off one even if there were. (26 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Website is almost finished...
|
|
You might want to remove the official logo of LEGO. Telling that your site is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by LEGO is enough. You may not use the logo. Jeremy Crawford <demon_slayah@yahoo.com> wrote in message (...) (26 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup?
|
|
(...) Well I really don't think this post needs a reply and I have instituted my own rule about not posting flames in response to ignorant posts, so I won't but this seems as good a place as any for me to post about how I feel on the matter. 1. As (...) (26 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
