 | | Re: Remote RCX control using a second RCX
|
|
For those not lucky enough to have a second RCX, the LEGO remote control works great as well. As bonus, you even can control your RCX without even writing any code. Just press the A,B, or C buttons to control the A,B, or C motors remotely! Pretty (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Not Craig-0 Lego, but still not bad...
|
|
(...) Well that's ONE good use for those silly collar pieces. (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: detecting goal objects at a distance
|
|
(...) OK, thanks for the info. That's interesting. I'll look for it. Uwe (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Swearing! (was something else)
|
|
(...) Agreed. As one of the biggest "keep it clean advocates" (it was a post referencing a post of Tims that referenced a post of mine that James chose to reference, and it's a point I've been making for over a year) it's not the person I object to, (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Speed of RCX interpreting bytecodes: slow
|
|
(...) OK, I did some basic timing experiments....for pbForth. : TEST1 10000 0 DO LOOP ; \ This is a hard loop of 10000 iterations : TEST2 10000 0 DO I DROP LOOP ; \ Same loop except the loop index is put on the \ stack and dropped - a no-op (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
