|
|
 | | Re: General Comments to MLCad
|
| (...) Yep. LDLite does things like 0 COLOR <color definition information> along with other stuff, and the HTML instruction generator in LDAO recognizes a subassembly statement: 0 SUB <file> <layout options> and in lugnet.cad.dev, we're proposing to (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Seeking info - Defense Archer - Europe only set?
|
| (...) Yeah, I've been reading those. Brad Justus never said we couldn't discuss them, though (at least, not to my knowledge). Since nothing has been said, discussions are fair game as far as I am concerned. Jeff (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| | | | | Re: Installation error on New RIS 1.5
|
| Re; ATI, I didn't find anything about Direct X problems on their site.. I'll look at MicroSoft. IsThere any contact at LEGO that should be advised of this type of install problem?? Maybe they would be ready for the Christmas-Morning Crash Rush... (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) In that case, why are we wiggling about with this BFC extension stuff? Rendering programs can figure out what order vertices should be put in, and they can figure out which way a polygon is facing. They don't need all this extra effort from us (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) Matrix-inversions are not evil. But for some reason, using them to actually invert subfiles is evil (as opposed to using INVERTNEXT to invert subfiles). If I reallly needed an answer to this, I'd go read past messages. But I *do* remember: a) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
