 | | Re: AT-ST POVRAY Rendering
|
|
(...) Shaun: The AT-ST is great! I hope that Lego does such a good job on their design when they produce one in 2001 (I hope...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
|
(...) Try (URL). It's not searchable (yet), but it is browseable. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: General Comments to MLCad
|
|
(...) It would be better (IMO) to format non-LDraw information as LDraw-style meta-commands, and keep everything in the DAT format. That gives the file the widest transportability between programs. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Transmission made from standard Technic parts
|
|
(...) Similar to the 8860 and 8865 designs, here's a very simple and compact one: As a carrier, have two 'beams' with 3 holes with 1.5 stud spacing (i.e. 2 standard beams, any size, and a 1-beam between them) with 5 studs of space between them. In (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: parts list reference.
|
|
(...) Tom, Why did you post this, especially to .cad.dat.ideas? The data has nothing to do with the charter for l.c.d.i. Maybe it would have been better to point people to the source of your data, which I believe is Lutz's part list. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
