 | | Re: More studs in holes...
|
|
(...) IMHO, of course. --Todd (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: "Forening af nordiske LEGO-byggere"
|
|
Vi skulle kunna ha "nallen noffle" som vår maskot :-) Jag har en passande teddybjörn, som gärna agerar internet-modell. --Tobias (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.loc.no, lugnet.loc.dk, lugnet.loc.fi)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V1.6 IS AVAILABLE NOW ****
|
|
(...) i agree that it might be walking the line a little.. and Mike asked me about that when he asked me to photoshop the logo for him... since his proggy is free, and since the "mindstormish" logo doens't actually appear within the program i don't (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: More studs in holes...
|
|
(...) I don't think it's correct that such a configuration was unintended. In fact, I think it most definitely *was* intended. All the classic LEGO measurements are magic multiples of 1/5 the standard interstud spacing, which also equals 1/6 the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) I like your explanation better, but I think we're both missing the point: this paragraph is supposed to be about INVERTNEXT, not inversion. Fewer details are appropriate at this point. More details should go in (1) the explanation of inversion (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
