 | | Re: Ben's LEGO 4449 Daylight train.
|
|
(...) You talk about the trucks sliding forward and backwards. It seems to me that the body would hinder this from happening due to the fact that it connects to the the front and rear trucks via two stationary pins. Since the body doesn't stretch (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Rerelease of old Lego sets
|
|
Jamie Obrien <jamien@interworx.com.au> wrote in article <N+ckOPjLQK136+rRtpM...ax.com>... (...) Putting these sets back out in packing that is specifically marked as 'Reissue' should virtually eliminate any problems of value. Change the colors of (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Rerelease of old Lego sets
|
|
(...) we'll see (...) (therein (...) increasingly (...) put a (...) If rereleasing better designed classic sets means that they will be considered 'no longer high-tech'... then rerelease away! Any of the LEGO space stuff, new and old alike are just (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Different Idea over CastleDastville
|
|
(...) That you insist on? How about we all AGREE to some rules? After all, this isn't just YOUR project, right? (...) I don't think this is valid at all. One good thing that could come out of this is showing off just what we _could_ do if we could (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Jambalaya a dismal failure?
|
|
(...) So, does anyone know where the drab box is now? This one, I think, has taken way too long to get through the Canadian tour with very little updating. Of course, I'd probably not notice except that I'm next when it gets to the states. :) Ben (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
