To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *70809 (-5)
  Re: Rerelease of old Lego sets
 
Jamie Obrien <jamien@interworx.com.au> wrote in article <N+ckOPjLQK136+rRtpM...ax.com>... (...) Putting these sets back out in packing that is specifically marked as 'Reissue' should virtually eliminate any problems of value. Change the colors of (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Rerelease of old Lego sets
 
(...) we'll see (...) (therein (...) increasingly (...) put a (...) If rereleasing better designed classic sets means that they will be considered 'no longer high-tech'... then rerelease away! Any of the LEGO space stuff, new and old alike are just (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Different Idea over CastleDastville
 
(...) That you insist on? How about we all AGREE to some rules? After all, this isn't just YOUR project, right? (...) I don't think this is valid at all. One good thing that could come out of this is showing off just what we _could_ do if we could (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: Is Jambalaya a dismal failure?
 
(...) So, does anyone know where the drab box is now? This one, I think, has taken way too long to get through the Canadian tour with very little updating. Of course, I'd probably not notice except that I'm next when it gets to the states. :) Ben (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
 
  Re: Our Trip to the LEGO Store...
 
(...) Well, actually Patti was lost, Michael says he wasn't (and he was driving) and Ben was basically sleeping. :) Ben Roller (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR