|
|
 | | Re: FA(eBay): blue hoppers
|
| So you don't mind auctioning them off at 30, but you won't sell them for 30? (...) (27 years ago, 12-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
| | |  | | Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes: [Snipped] (...) Hmmm, hmmm, that might actually work, but I think it's just a tiny bit more complicated as you think. Please keep in mind that there are track parts implicitly intended for either the 4.5 V (...) (27 years ago, 12-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | |  | | Re: 2000 Catalog
|
| Richard Parsons wrote in message ... (...) Gee, that's a bit filter-happy, isn't it? Kevin Loch's a fairly prominent AFOL with potentially important things to contribute (as well as a poor joke or two, apparently). Isn't it better to save your (...) (27 years ago, 12-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: Freeware LEGO Software in an German Computer magazine
|
| (...) Gotta love babelfish: "Michael of laughter man program MLCAD" (27 years ago, 12-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | |  | | Re: FA(eBay): blue hoppers
|
| (...) No. 30 is the price at which I keep them. There is hysteresis here. The price I pay for one and the price I would sell one for differ. In other words, if anyone has blue hoppers they don't want and want to sell them to me, 30 is the very MOST (...) (27 years ago, 12-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
| |