 | | Re: I wonder where he got the scans from?
|
|
Here is the response from Ebay: We have reviewed the auction you have brought to our attention and taken appropriate action. We would also like to explain eBay's policy with respect to reports like yours. eBay is not in a position to make judgments (...) (27 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: FA(eBay): blue hoppers
|
|
(...) Yes, they did, and the gallery fees as well. They called it a courtesy credit so one could read between the lines that there is an implication that they were not obligated to do so. Their policy is vague in this area. (27 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: I wonder where he got the scans from?
|
|
You should have copied the e-mail to TLG. I suppose doing what he is doing can only harm the existing setup. Scott A (27 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: why eBay proxy bidding is broken
|
|
From a seller's standpoint, a proxy bid is not as powerful as a "FIRM" bid. A proxy is better than a minimum bid (with no proxy) though. High Firm Bid -------- | | (proxies in here somewhere) | | -------- Minimum Bid The question is, where should a (...) (27 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Wanted: BURPMAN
|
|
If anyone recently purchased a Rock Raiders set with "Rocky the Rock Monster" and just hates the BURPness of the brown blocky guy, I am willing to pay a few bucks for him plus shipping. Also, if you hate the idea of two-piece rocks, I am also (...) (27 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
