 | | Re: new Millennium Falcon
|
|
(...) What if the MF is a _Model_Team_ (or equivalent) set (and _not_ a minifig set) ? Then the observed level of detail _would_ be appropriate for Lego, wouldn't it? Franklin (27 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Close-ups on rebelscum.com
|
|
I agree, with you 100%, that B-Wing is cool looking. Another Naboo canopy and what looks like a new face, torso, and even maybe a helmet?? Looks promising. Oh, I can't wait for Boba Fett, he was my favorite character. Now we just need some STs, then (...) (27 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Building a moon-display for your space models
|
|
Thanks! I was thinking aobut something else: When taking photos of the display, maybe a piece of black paper would make a good background as a space-sky? It would be very interesting to know how TLG made their space-photos. Perhaps they used painted (...) (27 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone accually like 4561?
|
|
(...) Minifig accessories are okay, because they are small (and therefore cheap). But the best minifig accessories are the sort-of generic space-tools, specifically (in generally descending order of my preference): (6 URLs) These pieces can be (...) (27 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: new Millennium Falcon
|
|
(...) I disagree. I think it's definitely NOT Lego. If it is made of Lego, it's built to a scale that would preclude it from being a set- there's way too much detail on it. As much as I would like to beleive that this is an early look at a (...) (27 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
