 | | Re: Does anyone else think outback was modeled on the australian bush?
|
|
(...) I am building a lego shearer and mabie a shearing shed to go with him. All I need is a good design for a lego sheep. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (27 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Modern Police Department
|
|
Good design but datsville already has a police force, mine. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (27 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB)
|
|
(...) OIC now. I think. If an asymmetrical part is mirrored, it keeps the same shape, but is turned inside out. To get it right-side-out again, it must be re-mirrored. In other words, there's no way to produce left- and right-handed pairs of (...) (27 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB)
|
|
(...) Jacob: (...) Why? Having a negative determinate *should* turn subfiles inside-out. IMO. That's a useful function. Having programs checking determinates is not useful, and wastes rendering time. Steve (27 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
(...) We're it. So to speak. Steve (27 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files [DAT]
|
|
(...) 578 is compliant because it contains *only* subfile references, which have been verified to not mess up (C)CW-ness. But that doesn't mean the *subfiles* are compliant. It also assumes the compliant subfiles are oriented the way the author (me) (...) (27 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: tiny gears
|
|
(...) (URL) ___...___ Jonathan Pennington | -Wannabe Geologist/Anthropologist Charleston, SC | -Linux User and Advocate Email at jwp(at)awod.com | 83 V45 Magna "The Lighter Side" root@localhost (Spambot food) | 71 Triumph TR6C "Mistake" ---...--- (27 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <37f6c0d9.269680202@...et.com>... (...) Doh, you posted mere minutes before me and said the same thing. :) -Gary (27 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
Jean-Pierre PARIS wrote in message <37F660FB.1EC77AC9@w...doo.fr>... (...) I see where you're coming from now. You're right. (...) could (...) It's starting to sound like user intervention would be needed in most, if not all, cases. Maybe it would (...) (27 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
(...) This isn't automatic, but what if the program interrogates the user to pick a side which is facing outward? From that information, the program could then mark-up all adjacent sides. If the program ran out of sides, it could re-interrogate for (...) (27 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
