|
|
 | | Re: Pictures of new Shell promotional sets are up!
|
| (...) Nope. Here's why. The sets are sold by shell service stations. In america people don't usually get out when they fill up and go into the shop. Therefore it is not worth selling the sets in the us. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: NQC 2 Request
|
| (...) If anyone wants to add these functions into their own code... void OnFwdFor(const int m, const int &t) { Fwd(m); OnFor(m, t); } void OnRevFor(const int m, const int &t) { Rev(m); OnFor(m, t); } These should be efficient - everything will be (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | universal joints......
|
| Is there any way to just get a hold of a couple of universal joints. I have looked at Pitsco, but no luck. Lego only carries them with the gears and differentials but I am not willing to buy all those pieces I have plenty of. Any advice/info would (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: NQC 2 Request
|
| (...) No, that's not a big deal, I don't mind a "superset". Most of the NQC 2.0 changes were to make terminology consistent between RCX Code and NQC, etc. Dave (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: NQC 2 Request
|
| That's all that really happens when I add new calls anyway. Anything that even remotely looks like a function call is either an inline function of a macro, and not part of the language itself. I guess the real question is if its appropriate to (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
