Subject:
|
Re: NQC 2 Request
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Sep 1999 23:38:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4041 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <37DE2468.66B220C4@sundayta.co.uk>, David Warnock
<david@sundayta.co.uk> wrote:
> I just wondered whether it might be handy to add OnFwdFor(motors) and
> OnRevFor(motors).
If anyone wants to add these functions into their own code...
void OnFwdFor(const int m, const int &t) { Fwd(m); OnFor(m, t); }
void OnRevFor(const int m, const int &t) { Rev(m); OnFor(m, t); }
These should be efficient - everything will be inlined and no temporaries
will be created - unless a temporary is needed during the computation of
t...
int x, y;
OnFwdFor(x); // ok, no temporary
OnFwdFor(x+y); // need temp to compute x+y
Dave
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NQC 2 Request
|
| Dave, Thanks for all the comments in the thread. As I have not looked at the API supplied by the firmware I did not realise that the NQC api was such a close match. Adding the functions as you have suggested is a very neat solution. It is nice to (...) (25 years ago, 16-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
