 | | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) If the author is worried about maximum variation with minimal parts... go play with Silly-Putty. LEGO is not, at the heart, about combinatorics, it's about creations. Perhaps he should do more building and less math. Or, visit a convention (...) (13 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts not made by lego - 3D printed Bricks
|
|
(...) Good point. (...) Cool! Play well, Jacob (10 URLs) (13 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) A fair point, I suppose, though I maintain that since I was referring to "non AFOLs," I'm not sure that it's relevant. (13 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
--snip-- (...) no. Nowhere near 100%. There's a very high fraction of LEGO fans outside North America. (13 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Parts not made by lego - 3D printed Bricks
|
|
Based on an earlier post, I thought I would have another try at custom Lego bricks. Studs are hard. Clutch power is good. Fun to experiment. Someone who shall remain namless thinks this might be a cool way to make old parts no longer made. I (...) (13 years ago, 11-Mar-12, to lugnet.general)
|
