 | | Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
|
(...) If we ever get there to create an MPD standard, I would suggest way #2: Making 0 NAME compulsary in MPD-ed files. A good safety precaution would be to prompt user if 0 NAME data is present but doesn't match actual file name: * Rename file and (...) (14 years ago, 4-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Microscale trains by LDD
|
|
(...) Nice work! Benn (14 years ago, 4-Apr-10, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
|
(...) As 0 NAME is not required the only possible way of identifying a parts name is the content in the 0 FILE entry. So I have now two ways to go. 1) Only take the 0 FILE entry 2) If there is no 0 NAME entry - create one on the fly at MPD loading. (...) (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: List / Poll of MPD Programs
|
|
(...) I am not sure, but I think MLCad has introduced MPD files. To your question: Yes, it can split. Use Mulitpart - Export Models and all files in the mpd will be stored in separate files on the disk with their names. Or you can choose File - (...) (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
|
(...) I tend to view MPD's as something between ZIP archives (without compression though) and file directories. I guess my idea is not yet supported - at least not by very many utilities - but I wish to add new files into already existing MPD model (...) (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
