 | | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
--snip-- (...) I felt you were preaching to the choir here so decided to broaden the questions and broaden the audience. Hopefully this will give us a bit of an idea of how the broader community deals with LDraw. (URL) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Curling
|
|
I like to watch this kind of sports also. (URL) is another example, quite simillar in counting the points per turn. On MOCpages, you seem to suggest that the Norwegian team plays against the Swedish team. In that case, the depictions of the two (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.town, FTX)
|
| |
| | [FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group] Les nouveautés samedi 13 mars 2010
|
|
Bonjour Voici la lettre d'information du site "FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group" ((URL) lettre recense les articles et les brèves publiés depuis 1 jours. Nouveaux articles ---...--- ** CR de la réunion du CA du 15 février 2010 ** par (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.org.fr.freelug)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
--snip-- (...) --snip-- (...) Honestly I don't think LDD is so much of a competitor for many people. Its limited parts pallette keeps it quite restrictive. LDraw will always be the high end tool for LEGO CAD due to its versatility and when people (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) Times changes and also the behaviour of the people. The internet changes much quicker. But I think the most important item is that LUTNET and also LDraw.org does not make adverticements. So how should be people find us. The new possibilities (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) There are plenty of people still using LDraw and plenty of newcomers to it.In some ways I think it's a victim of its own success. The software is well developed and easy to use and the parts library is vast and easy to install. As such people (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Making Robot and Erik¡¦s Plotter
|
|
(...) site was discontinued. You may download the latest UR version 151 from: www.convict.lu/ULTIM...UR_151.zip Good luck, -Claude (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | The future of LDraw?
|
|
There is a discussion in the Lugnet group at facebook on the fact that people leave Lugnet.com in favour for other, often theme specialized sites. Questions like "Why is it so and what can be done to get people back to Lugnet?" are discussed. Some (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: February 27th, 2010 SMART meeting
|
|
(...) It hardly seems possible, but our next SMART meeting is in two weeks! If you haven't started your mini-challenge robot yet, now might be a good time! See you then! -- David Schilling (15 years ago, 13-Mar-10, to lugnet.org.us.smart)
|
| |
| | Re: number notation in official parts
|
|
(...) Thanks for the info. I've always used perl scripts to convert oddly formatted data to a consistent format and then read it like that. Nice to know I don't always have to. If it could only read some of the more bizarre Fortran formats I'd never (...) (15 years ago, 12-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: number notation in official parts
|
|
(...) All float specifiers (e, E, f, g, G) are treated identically by the scanf functions. When scanning floats, they always recognize all float formats. One other thing about %g on output is that it automatically strips trailing zeros, which %f (...) (15 years ago, 12-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Santander Bank - LEGO TV ads
|
|
(...) Why would they? Neither of these things you describe are trademarks despite the best efforts of LEGO lawyers. The blocks could just as easily be clone brand. (15 years ago, 12-Mar-10, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Santander Bank - LEGO TV ads
|
|
(...) Let me put it that way: Santander is a bank - I can't really see how they fail to get their legal homework done. After all, with the visibility, there's no-cost publicity for LEGO in there... (or so you'd think at least...) Regards, Jerry (15 years ago, 12-Mar-10, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: number notation in official parts
|
|
(...) Ahhh. I'd never heard of %g before now. I'm so used to %f and %e it had never occured to me that there might be a mixed option. Handy to know as I suspect it would be helpful in reading files of unknown format. I'm sure Delphi has some hideous (...) (15 years ago, 12-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: number notation in official parts
|
|
(...) Actually, in C, %g does exactly this. Having said that, I think LDDP is a Delphi app, so it uses Pascal, and I don't remember how Pascal does formatting. --Travis (15 years ago, 12-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: number notation in official parts
|
|
(...) I definitely know this. I see them far too much in my job as a numerical physicist ;) My point is that to write in mixed format (some %f and others %e) requires some strange coding unless there is a weird language which does it automatically. (...) (15 years ago, 12-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: number notation in official parts
|
|
(...) Hmm, I thought I killed that "feature". I'll look into it as I find time to finish up LDDP 2.1 -Orion (15 years ago, 11-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Making Robot and Erik¡¦s Plotter
|
|
(...) Dear Claude, I am really making advances in my studies. I thank you again for the library. May you send another link for this broken link (URL) thought I had Ultimate Robolab on my computer but a search revealed, noƒ¼ (15 years ago, 11-Mar-10, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | LEGO HockeyBots
|
|
A couple of weeks ago I posted the (URL) HiTechnic HockeyBot> on the new HiTechnic blog and video on (URL). My brother Pehr was inspired and made his own LEGO Hockey robot video: (URL) YouTube - Lotechnics.dv> Enjoy! Gus (15 years ago, 11-Mar-10, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.animation, lugnet.org.us.smart, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: number notation in official parts
|
|
(...) I mostly agree with this policy. (...) There is nothing strange in the routines, it is the standard format used to represent very large or very small numbers in a limited number of digits. Actually since values never get very large in LDraw (...) (15 years ago, 11-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
